Latest Tweets:

My Call to Senator Schumer’s Office on PIPA: It’s So Much Worse Than I Thought

Today I called a Senator’s office for the first time.

First, let me say how fantastic it is that when you call the office, a real-live human picks up the phone and can speak to you. There’s no annoying menus, no transfers, no answering machines. Washington, please don’t ever change this.

I was calling mostly to find out why the Senator supports (and co-sponsored!) S.968, aka the PROTECT IP Act aka PIPA. Perhaps there was an argument I was missing — I know how myopic the tech world can be sometimes.

What I got was a reminder of how dangerous this legislation will be, for people who care about:

  • the internet
  • technology innovation
  • creativity
  • freedom of speech
  • startups and job creation
  • facebook, tumblr, youtube, reddit, 4chan, and any other major site that touches user-generated content

OK so back to my phone call. The first question I asked was “why does the Senator support this legislation?”

The guy on the other end of the phone said: “well, he’s a co-sponsor so he’s not changing his position.”

He must have known why I was calling.

Asked the same question again. This time the reply I got this time was different: “Senator Schumer is in favor of censoring the internet.”

….whhhhhhat? Up until now, most of the statements from congresspeople have done that neat thing politicians do where they say words but don’t actually answer the question. They do the “censorship” dance very well – never say it out loud, but vote for the bill nonetheless. From what I can tell “anti-piracy” and “pro-censorship” are actually the same thing here, though politicians usually argue the former so as not to seem anti-first-amendment. No one has been brazen enough to drop the C-word without hesitation. But this dude apparently had no problem with it. I said again: “So you’re saying Senator Schumer is in favor of censoring the internet?”

“Yes.”

(Source: azspot)

  1. peacockgoddess reblogged this from sinshine
  2. morganwolf reblogged this from winneganfake and added:
    And you thought he was one of the less-schmucky NY senators.
  3. winneganfake reblogged this from sinshine
  4. sinshine reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  5. conservativesforboobs reblogged this from talkstraight and added:
    When I called Schumer’s office, his representative said “even though he co-sponsored the bill, he’s carefully reviewing...
  6. sarcasmisdead reblogged this from azspot
  7. mjcjla reblogged this from azspot
  8. guerrillanetwork reblogged this from jjarichardson
  9. jjarichardson reblogged this from goodreasonnews
  10. wordsbetweenbreaths reblogged this from operapourlepaix
  11. kateinva reblogged this from robotbutler
  12. robotbutler reblogged this from operapourlepaix
  13. wareq reblogged this from divineirony
  14. divineirony reblogged this from goodreasonnews
  15. marxmaterialized reblogged this from socialistexan
  16. awalt2069 reblogged this from azspot
  17. seymourbuhts reblogged this from vinegarwilliams
  18. neytari reblogged this from alternadoll
  19. viciousneutral reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president and added:
    Absolutely terrifying.
  20. alternadoll reblogged this from disobey
  21. viviano reblogged this from azspot
  22. jackpowerx reblogged this from socialistexan
  23. questionall reblogged this from socialistexan
  24. yodasithfoor reblogged this from vinegarwilliams
  25. fightforcydonia reblogged this from infinite-green28
  26. coffeecollie reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  27. cecinestpasungeek reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  28. shirley-nomates reblogged this from slytherinmyswagkorra
  29. ichliebeapfelsaft reblogged this from goodreasonnews
  30. slytherinmyswagkorra reblogged this from sexgenderbody
  31. myrealtake reblogged this from azspot and added:
    The bolded emphasis is mine.