Latest Tweets:
also: twitter · flickr · last.fm
scudmissile.net
Ask me anything | Submit | Archive | RSS
Today I called a Senator’s office for the first time. First, let me say how fantastic it is that when you call the office, a real-live human picks up the phone and can speak to you. There’s no annoying menus, no transfers, no answering machines. Washington, please don’t ever change this. I was calling mostly to find out why the Senator supports (and co-sponsored!) S.968, aka the PROTECT IP Act aka PIPA. Perhaps there was an argument I was missing — I know how myopic the tech world can be sometimes. What I got was a reminder of how dangerous this legislation will be, for people who care about: OK so back to my phone call. The first question I asked was “why does the Senator support this legislation?” The guy on the other end of the phone said: “well, he’s a co-sponsor so he’s not changing his position.” He must have known why I was calling. Asked the same question again. This time the reply I got this time was different: “Senator Schumer is in favor of censoring the internet.” ….whhhhhhat? Up until now, most of the statements from congresspeople have done that neat thing politicians do where they say words but don’t actually answer the question. They do the “censorship” dance very well – never say it out loud, but vote for the bill nonetheless. From what I can tell “anti-piracy” and “pro-censorship” are actually the same thing here, though politicians usually argue the former so as not to seem anti-first-amendment. No one has been brazen enough to drop the C-word without hesitation. But this dude apparently had no problem with it. I said again: “So you’re saying Senator Schumer is in favor of censoring the internet?” “Yes.” (Source: azspot)
And you thought he was one of the less-schmucky NY senators.
When I called Schumer’s office, his representative said “even though he co-sponsored the bill, he’s carefully reviewing...
Absolutely terrifying.
The bolded emphasis is mine.