Latest Tweets:
also: twitter · flickr · last.fm
scudmissile.net
Ask me anything | Submit | Archive | RSS
Christopher Hitchens and the protocol for public figure deaths Hitchens was obviously more urbane and well-written than the average neocon faux-warrior, but he was also often more vindictive and barbaric about his war cheerleading. One of the only writers with the courage to provide the full picture of Hitchens upon his death was Gawker‘s John Cook, who — in an extremely well-written and poignant obituary – detailed Hitchens’ vehement, unapologetic passion for the attack on Iraq and his dismissive indifference to the mass human suffering it caused, accompanied by petty contempt for those who objected (he denounced the Dixie Chicks as being “sluts” and “fucking fat slags” for the crime of mildly disparaging the Commander-in-Chief). As Cook put it: “it must not be forgotten in mourning him that he got the single most consequential decision in his life horrifically, petulantly wrong”; indeed: “People make mistakes. What’s horrible about Hitchens’ ardor for the invasion of Iraq is that he clung to it long after it became clear that a grotesque error had been made.” If you were one of those people outraged by companies pulling their ads from All-American Muslim and then turned around to heap lavish praise on Hitchens, leading figure of Islamobashism, please punch yourself in the face. Don’t hold back. (via tylercoates)
He’s the same asshole who wrote that Vanity Fair piece about how he believed women aren’t funny. I shouldn’t say I’m...
Oh shit, 99 is being sanctimonious! He’s being sanctimonious. Oh shit. 99.
He’s even more useful for a certain type of writer because it’s been a good two decades since he could claim even a...
The YM commentary is ridiculous, but the piece linked to is not, and completely worth reading if only for this bit: